Eucharistic adoration
Eucharistic adoration is the devotional practice of adoring Christ in relation to the consecrated bread and wine of the Eucharist. In Anglican history, the topic is controversial because it touches the doctrine of Christ's presence, the purpose of the sacrament, Reformation critiques of medieval devotion, and later Anglo-Catholic recovery of eucharistic piety. A careful Anglican account must distinguish reverence for Christ in Holy Communion from theological claims and practices rejected by the prayer book and Articles.
Definition
Eucharistic adoration usually refers to worship directed toward Christ believed to be present in the consecrated sacrament. In Roman Catholic practice, this can include exposition of the consecrated host in a monstrance, Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, and periods of silent adoration outside the Mass.
Anglican use is more varied. Some Anglo-Catholic parishes practice forms of eucharistic adoration or Benediction. Other Anglicans reject such practices as inconsistent with the Articles of Religion and the Reformation purpose of the sacrament. Many Anglicans occupy a middle position, showing deep reverence during Holy Communion while avoiding devotions centered on the reserved sacrament.
Historical Background
In the medieval Western church, devotion to the consecrated host developed alongside scholastic accounts of transubstantiation. Elevation of the host, Corpus Christi processions, reservation, and adoration became important features of late medieval piety. These practices expressed devotion to Christ, but they also became targets of Reformation criticism.
English reformers objected especially to any practice that appeared to separate the sacrament from reception. They argued that Christ instituted the sacrament to be taken and eaten, not gazed upon or carried about apart from communion. They also objected to doctrines and ceremonies associated with the sacrifice of the Mass.
The Edwardian Reformation removed or discouraged many practices connected with eucharistic adoration. Later Anglican history, however, saw renewed interest in eucharistic devotion, especially through the Oxford Movement and Anglo-Catholic revival.
Anglican Context
Anglican views on eucharistic adoration differ because Anglican eucharistic theology itself has been received in different ways. Evangelical and Reformed Anglicans typically emphasize Article XXVIII, which rejects transubstantiation and says the sacrament was not ordained by Christ to be gazed upon or carried about. Anglo-Catholic Anglicans often emphasize the real presence of Christ and the fittingness of adoration directed to him.
The disagreement should not be caricatured. Reformed Anglicans do not deny that Christ is to be adored; they deny that adoration should be attached to the elements apart from sacramental reception. Anglo-Catholics do not intend to worship bread; they intend to adore Christ present in the sacrament. The Anglican dispute concerns how Christ's eucharistic presence should be confessed and practiced.
This page should connect with Receptionism, Holy Communion (1928 BCP), Book of Common Prayer, Articles of Religion (1928 BCP), Oxford Movement, Anglo-Catholicism, Reserved sacrament, and Monstrance.
Liturgical / Prayer Book Significance
The prayer book tradition places Holy Communion within the action of the liturgy: taking, blessing, breaking, giving, and receiving. The sacrament is ordered toward communion. This is why Reformation Anglican sources were cautious about reservation and adoration outside the liturgical act.
Article XXVIII is central. It rejects transubstantiation and states that the sacrament was not ordained by Christ to be reserved, carried about, lifted up, or worshipped. This language has had major significance in Anglican debates. It does not forbid reverence during the Eucharist, but it does challenge devotional practices that appear to detach the sacrament from reception.
Later Anglican practice has not been uniform. Some provinces and parishes allow reservation for the communion of the sick. Some Anglo-Catholic communities have developed devotional practices around the reserved sacrament. Others maintain stricter prayer book and Articles-based limits.
For this reason, Anglican accounts of eucharistic adoration should usually distinguish pastoral reservation from devotional exposition. Reservation for the sick can be defended as an extension of communion to absent members of the church, while exposition and Benediction raise broader questions about the purpose for which Christ instituted the sacrament.[1]
Theological Significance
The theological issue is not whether Christ is worthy of adoration. All orthodox Anglicans affirm that the incarnate, crucified, risen, and ascended Lord is to be worshipped. The issue is how Christ is present and how the sacrament should be used according to his institution.
Eucharistic adoration therefore tests Anglican theological method. Scripture, the ancient church, the Articles, prayer book rubrics, pastoral practice, and devotional experience all enter the discussion. The topic also exposes real differences between Anglican church parties.
For AnglicanWiki, the article should teach readers to understand the debate fairly. It should neither dismiss eucharistic devotion as mere superstition nor present it as the only serious form of sacramental piety. A good Anglican treatment explains the controversy, the sources, and the pastoral stakes.
See Also
- Receptionism
- Holy Communion (1928 BCP)
- Book of Common Prayer
- Articles of Religion (1928 BCP)
- Oxford Movement
- Anglo-Catholicism
- Reserved sacrament
- Monstrance
References
- ↑ Marion J. Hatchett, Commentary on the American Prayer Book (Seabury Press, 1980), discussion of communion of the sick and reservation.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "article28" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "dix2" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "hatchett2" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "ockelley" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.