Baptismal Covenant in the 1928 BCP

From AnglicanWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Baptismal Covenant in the 1928 BCP refers to the covenantal pattern of renunciation, faith, grace, obligation, and Christian nurture in the 1928 American Book of Common Prayer. The 1928 book does not contain a separate rite titled "The Baptismal Covenant." Its covenantal theology is found instead in Holy Baptism, the Catechism, and Confirmation: God receives, regenerates, and incorporates the baptized; sponsors or adult candidates answer with renunciation, Creedal faith, desire for Baptism, and a promise of obedience "by God's help"; the baptized person later owns that promise in catechesis and Confirmation.

This pattern is important for reading the 1928 BCP on its own terms. "Covenant" in this context is not a modern contract between equals and not a self-standing renewal formula. It is the Prayer Book's ordered way of joining divine promise and human answer: the gift of grace comes first, and the vowed life of repentance, faith, and obedience follows within that grace.

Prayer Book Order

The baptismal office begins with Christ's words about new birth and with prayer for what the child or adult cannot have by nature. It then sets the baptismal vows after Gospel, prayer, and thanksgiving. The minister's address to sponsors makes this order explicit: the promises answer what has already been prayed for.

Dearly beloved, ye have brought this Child here to be baptized; ye have prayed that our Lord Jesus Christ would vouchsafe to receive him, to release him from sin, to sanctify him with the Holy Ghost, to give him the kingdom of heaven, and everlasting life.

Dost thou, therefore, in the name of this Child, renounce the devil and all his works, the vain pomp and glory of the world, with all covetous desires of the same, and the sinful desires of the flesh, so that thou wilt not follow, nor be led by them?

Answer. I renounce them all; and, by God's help, will endeavor not to follow, nor be led by them.

[1]

The word "therefore" matters. The sponsor's renunciation is not the ground on which Christ receives the child. It is the required answer to the grace sought from Christ: release from sin, sanctification by the Holy Ghost, the kingdom of heaven, and everlasting life. The renunciation is therefore covenantal and moral, but it remains dependent on grace. The answer is not simply "I renounce"; it is "by God's help."

The next interrogations give the positive side of the same covenantal pattern. The baptized life is not defined by renunciation alone. It is ordered to the Apostles' Creed, Baptism in that faith, and obedience to God's commandments.

Minister. Dost thou believe all the Articles of the Christian Faith, as contained in the Apostles' Creed?

Answer. I do.

Minister. Wilt thou be baptized in this Faith?

Answer. That is my desire.

Minister. Wilt thou then obediently keep God's holy will and commandments, and walk in the same all the days of thy life?

Answer. I will, by God's help.

[2]

The three parts should be read together. Renunciation without Creedal faith would be a moral program; Creedal profession without obedience would be verbal assent only; obedience without grace would be presumption. The Prayer Book joins all three, and repeats the dependence on divine help.

For adults the same structure is made personal. The adult candidate answers for himself, first renouncing the devil, the world, and the flesh, and then confessing Christ as Saviour and Lord before the Creedal questions.

Dost thou believe in Jesus the Christ, the Son of the Living God?

Answer. I do.

Minister. Dost thou accept him, and desire to follow him as thy Saviour and Lord?

Answer. I do.

[3]

This adult form guards against reducing baptismal covenant to church membership or ethical seriousness. The candidate is asked about Jesus Christ personally, then about the faith of the Church and the obedient life that follows. The office therefore connects John 3:5 with Matthew 28:19-20: new birth by water and the Spirit belongs with baptism in the Triune Name and continuing discipleship.

Sponsors and Catechesis

In the baptism of children, sponsors are not merely witnesses to a family ceremony. After the child's promises have been made, the minister asks the sponsors to undertake Christian instruction and eventual presentation for Confirmation.

Minister. Having now, in the name of this Child, made these promises, will ye also on your part take heed that he learn the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and the Ten Commandments, and all other things which a Christian ought to know and believe, to his soul's health?

Answer. I will, by God's help.

Minister. Will ye take heed that this Child, so soon as sufficiently instructed, be brought to the Bishop to be confirmed by him?

Answer. I will, God being my helper.

[4]

This explains why the Catechism is not an optional appendix to the baptismal office. The Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and the Ten Commandments are named at the font because they are the grammar of the baptized life. The covenantal promise therefore creates a pastoral duty: sponsors, parents, clergy, and congregation must teach the child to understand and own the faith in which he was baptized.

The Catechism later compresses the baptismal promises into three things: renunciation, belief, and obedience. It also teaches the baptized person to speak of these promises as binding.

They did promise and vow three things in my name: First, that I should renounce the devil and all his works, the pomps and vanity of this wicked world, and all the sinful lusts of the flesh; Secondly, that I should believe all the Articles of the Christian Faith; And Thirdly, that I should keep God's holy will and commandments, and walk in the same all the days of my life.

[5]

The next answer prevents a merely external reading of infant Baptism. The baptized person is bound to believe and do what was promised, but the answer begins and ends in grace: "by God's help," thanksgiving for the state of salvation, and prayer to continue in it.

Yes, verily; and by God's help so I will. And I heartily thank our heavenly Father, that he hath called me to this state of salvation, through Jesus Christ our Saviour. And I pray unto God to give me his grace, that I may continue in the same unto my life's end.

[6]

Confirmation and Personal Ownership

The 1928 Confirmation office makes the baptismal covenant public again. The candidates are presented to the bishop after instruction, and the bishop asks them to renew the promise and vow made at Baptism.

Do ye here, in the presence of God, and of this congregation, renew the solemn promise and vow that ye made, or that was made in your name, at your Baptism; ratifying and confirming the same; and acknowledging yourselves bound to believe and to do all those things which ye then undertook, or your Sponsors then undertook for you?

And every one shall audibly answer, I do.

[7]

Confirmation is therefore not a second Baptism and not a substitute for Baptism. It is the episcopal rite in which instructed baptized persons renew, ratify, and confirm what was already promised at the font. The covenantal movement is thus baptismal, catechetical, and ecclesial: the Church baptizes, teaches, presents, and lays hands on those who now answer for themselves.

Doctrinal Frame

Article XXVII gives the doctrinal boundary for speaking of baptismal covenant. Baptism is more than a sign of profession or a badge distinguishing Christians from others. It is also a sacramental sign of regeneration and new birth, and it visibly signs and seals the promises of forgiveness and adoption.

Baptism is not only a sign of profession, and mark of difference, whereby Christian men are discerned from others that be not christened, but it is also a sign of Regeneration or New-Birth, whereby, as by an instrument, they that receive Baptism rightly are grafted into the Church; the promises of the forgiveness of sin, and of our adoption to be the sons of God by the Holy Ghost, are visibly signed and sealed; Faith is confirmed, and Grace increased by virtue of prayer unto God.

The Baptism of young Children is in any wise to be retained in the Church, as most agreeable with the institution of Christ.

[8]

This article helps define what the 1928 baptismal covenant is and is not. It is not a theory that human promises create sacramental grace. Nor is it a merely external enrollment. Baptism signs and seals divine promises; the vows bind the baptized to the life appropriate to those promises. In classical Anglican language, gift and obligation belong together because the sacrament is received rightly in faith and prayer.

Historical Anglican Interpretation

Anthony Sparrow, a seventeenth-century Anglican bishop, explicitly interpreted the baptismal interrogations as covenantal. His account is useful because it treats the form of renunciation as ancient and theologically reasonable, not as an incidental ceremony.

We have seen that it was Ancient. And that it is Reasonable we shall perceive, if we consider, that in baptism we are making or concluding a Covenant, the New Covenant of the Gospel; in which Covenant Gods part is promises, precious promises, as S. Peter calls them, 2 S. Pet. 1. 4. for performance of which he hath given his word; and therefore good reason it is, that we also should give our word, and promise for performance of conditions on our parts, viz. to renounce the Devil and the World, and swear fidelity to our LORD.

[9]

Sparrow's interpretation fits the 1928 pattern closely. God's promises come first; the baptized then give word and promise to renounce evil and live in fidelity to the Lord. This also explains why the Prayer Book can ask solemn vows from sponsors without making the sponsors the real parties in place of the child. They answer in the child's name so that the child may later be taught to own the promise.

Michael Ferrebee Sadler's nineteenth-century catechetical manual shows the same pastoral logic in a teaching form. He connects the Christian name, Baptism, covenant, divine benefits, human duties, and godparents.

Why was it given to you then?

Because I was then brought into covenant with God.

What is a covenant?

An agreement between two or more persons.

What was then agreed upon between you and God?

God agreed to give me certain benefits, and I agreed to do certain duties.

By whom did God make the agreement?

By the minister who baptized me.

Through whom did you make the agreement?

Through my god-parents.

[10]

Sadler is not a 1928 American authority, but his manual is a traceable Anglican witness to the catechetical assumptions behind the Prayer Book sequence. The baptized child is not treated as making autonomous vows in infancy. The child is brought within the covenantal life of the Church and then taught to understand the benefits and duties that belong to that state.

Edward Harold Browne, in his exposition of Article XXVII, gives a more doctrinal account of the same point. He begins from God's covenant of grace and then describes Baptism as formal admission into that covenant.

Now baptism is the formal act by which we are admitted into covenant with God. It is the embracing of God's covenant of grace in Christ: in the case of adults, by their own deliberate choice; in the case of infants, by God's merciful appointment, and according to the election of grace.

[11]

Browne's next summary of baptismal blessings keeps covenant from becoming mere obligation. The covenant is a covenant of grace because God gives pardon, spiritual aid, and final life in Christ.

Hence again, we infer that the promises to the baptized, and therefore the blessings of baptism, are: (1.) Pardon of sins. (2.) The aid of the Spirit of God. (3.) If not forfeited, everlasting life.

[12]

This is the doctrinal balance needed for the 1928 BCP. The baptismal covenant imposes real obligation: renounce evil, believe the faith, keep God's commandments, and walk in them all one's days. Yet the office and Catechism repeatedly locate that obligation inside grace: "by God's help," "this state of salvation," and prayer that God give grace to continue.

Pastoral Use

In parish teaching, "baptismal covenant" should be explained from the actual 1928 texts rather than from a later formula. The basic pattern is simple: God receives and gives; the baptized renounces, believes, and obeys; the Church teaches and confirms; the baptized person continues by grace.

This reading also guards against two common distortions. Against a merely symbolic account, the Prayer Book prays for regeneration, release from sin, sanctification, incorporation, and everlasting life, and Article XXVII says that baptism visibly signs and seals the promises of forgiveness and adoption. Against a mechanical or nominal account, the baptized life is bound to renunciation, Creedal faith, commandments, catechesis, Confirmation, and perseverance. The covenantal shape of the 1928 BCP is therefore neither sentimental nor legalistic. It is sacramental, ecclesial, and moral, with grace as both beginning and continuance.

See Also

References

  1. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, The Ministration of Holy Baptism, address and first interrogation of sponsors, p. 276; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, The Ministration of Holy Baptism in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local source sources/justus1928/Baptism.htm, lines 221-235; HTML italics and entity apostrophes normalized.
  2. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, The Ministration of Holy Baptism, baptismal interrogations following renunciation, p. 276; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, The Ministration of Holy Baptism in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local source sources/justus1928/Baptism.htm, lines 237-244; HTML italics and entity apostrophes normalized.
  3. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, The Ministration of Holy Baptism, adult baptismal interrogations concerning Christ, p. 277; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, The Ministration of Holy Baptism in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local source sources/justus1928/Baptism.htm, lines 279-283; HTML italics normalized.
  4. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, The Ministration of Holy Baptism, sponsor promises after the baptismal interrogations, p. 277; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, The Ministration of Holy Baptism in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local source sources/justus1928/Baptism.htm, lines 245-256; HTML italics and entity apostrophes normalized.
  5. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, A Catechism, opening questions on Baptism and sponsors, p. 577; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, The Catechism in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local source sources/justus1928/Catechism.htm, lines 62-69; HTML line wrapping normalized.
  6. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, A Catechism, answer concerning personal obligation to the baptismal promises, p. 577; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, The Catechism in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local source sources/justus1928/Catechism.htm, lines 70-76; HTML entity apostrophes normalized.
  7. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, The Order of Confirmation, renewal of baptismal promise and vow, p. 296; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, The Order of Confirmation in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local source sources/justus1928/Confirmation.htm, lines 597-606; the resolving Justus filename is Confirnation.htm; HTML line wrapping and hyphenation normalized.
  8. ↑ Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, The Book of Common Prayer, Standard Book accepted in 1928, Articles of Religion, Article XXVII, "Of Baptism"; Society of Archbishop Justus transcription, Articles of Religion in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Quotation compared with local fetched source tmp/revision-research/baptismal-regeneration/Articles.htm, Article XXVII; HTML line wrapping normalized.
  9. ↑ Anthony Sparrow, A Rationale upon the Book of Common Prayer (London, 1672), "Of Baptism"; Project Canterbury transcription, A Rationale upon the Book of Common Prayer: Of Baptism. URL resolved and wording verified 2026-08-05.
  10. ↑ Michael Ferrebee Sadler, The Church Teacher's Manual of Christian Instruction: Being the Church Catechism Expanded and Explained in Question and Answer, 3rd ed. (London: Bell & Daldy, 1872), Section I, "The Christian Name"; Internet Archive scan and text, The Church Teacher's Manual of Christian Instruction. Quotation compared with local OCR source sources/churchteachersma00sadlrich_djvu.txt, lines 363-389; OCR artifacts corrected against context and page heading.
  11. ↑ Edward Harold Browne, An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles: Historical and Doctrinal, edited with notes by John Williams (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1883), Article XXVII, p. 621; Internet Archive scan and text, An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles. Quotation compared with local OCR source tmp/expositionofthi00brow_djvu.txt, p. 621; OCR punctuation and spacing normalized.
  12. ↑ Edward Harold Browne, An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles: Historical and Doctrinal, edited with notes by John Williams (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1883), Article XXVII, p. 621; Internet Archive scan and text, An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles. Quotation compared with local OCR source tmp/expositionofthi00brow_djvu.txt, p. 621; OCR punctuation and spacing normalized.

External Links

Retrieved from "https://www.anglicanwiki.org/index.php?title=Baptismal_Covenant_in_the_1928_BCP&oldid=2486"